TY - JOUR
T1 - First-line ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy
T2 - stratification of outcomes by left ventricular function
AU - Briceno Gomez, David F.
AU - Romero, Jorge
AU - Patel, Kavisha
AU - Liaqat, Wasla
AU - Zhang, Xiao Dong
AU - Alviz, Isabella
AU - Yang, Ruike
AU - Rodriguez, Daniel
AU - Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
AU - Rocca, Domenico Della
AU - Tarantino, Nicola
AU - Gopinathannair, Rakesh
AU - Natale, Andrea
AU - Di Biase, Luigi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Purpose: First-line catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) has been associated with improved outcomes; however, most benefit seems to be in patients with moderately depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Herein, outcomes were stratified based on LVEF. Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line ablation versus medical therapy in patients with VT and ICM was performed. Risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were measured. Results: Four RCTs with a total of 505 patients (mean age 66 ± 9 years, 89% male, 80% with previous revascularization) were included. Mean LVEF was 35 ± 8%. At a mean follow-up of 24 ± 9 months, a significant benefit in survival-free from appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies was observed in all patients undergoing first-line catheter ablation compared with medical management (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56–0.86). In patients with moderately depressed LVEF (> 30–50%), first-line VT ablation was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the composite endpoint of survival free from VT/VF and appropriate ICD therapies (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.76), whereas there was no difference in patients with severely depressed LVEF (≤30%) (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.24–1.32). Funnel plots did not show asymmetry suggesting lack of bias. Conclusions: Patients with ICM and VT undergoing first-line ablation have a significantly lower rate of appropriate ICD therapies without a mortality difference compared with patients receiving an initial approach based on medical therapy. The beneficial effect of a first-line ablation approach was only observed in patients with moderately depressed LVEF (> 30–50%).
AB - Purpose: First-line catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) has been associated with improved outcomes; however, most benefit seems to be in patients with moderately depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Herein, outcomes were stratified based on LVEF. Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line ablation versus medical therapy in patients with VT and ICM was performed. Risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were measured. Results: Four RCTs with a total of 505 patients (mean age 66 ± 9 years, 89% male, 80% with previous revascularization) were included. Mean LVEF was 35 ± 8%. At a mean follow-up of 24 ± 9 months, a significant benefit in survival-free from appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies was observed in all patients undergoing first-line catheter ablation compared with medical management (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56–0.86). In patients with moderately depressed LVEF (> 30–50%), first-line VT ablation was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the composite endpoint of survival free from VT/VF and appropriate ICD therapies (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.76), whereas there was no difference in patients with severely depressed LVEF (≤30%) (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.24–1.32). Funnel plots did not show asymmetry suggesting lack of bias. Conclusions: Patients with ICM and VT undergoing first-line ablation have a significantly lower rate of appropriate ICD therapies without a mortality difference compared with patients receiving an initial approach based on medical therapy. The beneficial effect of a first-line ablation approach was only observed in patients with moderately depressed LVEF (> 30–50%).
KW - Catheter ablation
KW - Heart failure
KW - Ischemic cardiomyopathy
KW - Ventricular tachycardia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095856495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095856495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10840-020-00912-w
DO - 10.1007/s10840-020-00912-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 33179155
AN - SCOPUS:85095856495
SN - 1383-875X
VL - 62
SP - 391
EP - 400
JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
IS - 2
ER -