Evolut PRO and SAPIEN ULTRA Performance in Small Aortic Annuli: The OPERA-TAVI Registry

Andrea Scotti, Matteo Sturla, Giuliano Costa, Francesco Saia, Thomas Pilgrim, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Philippe Garot, Caterina Gandolfo, Luca Branca, Ignacio Amat Santos, Darren Mylotte, Francesco Bedogni, Ole De Backer, Luis Nombela Franco, John Webb, Flavio Luciano Ribichini, Andrea Mainardi, Stefano Andreaggi, Alessandro Mazzapicchi, Daijiro TomiiPietro Laforgia, Stefano Cannata, Claudia Fiorina, Simone Fezzi, Enrico Criscione, Mattia Lunardi, Enrico Poletti, Mattia Mazzucca, Angelo Quagliana, Nicholas Montarello, Breda Hennessey, Matias Mon-Noboa, Myriam Akodad, David Meier, Federico De Marco, Marianna Adamo, Carmelo Sgroi, Claudia Maria Reddavid, Roberto Valvo, Orazio Strazzieri, Silvia Crescenzia Motta, Valentina Frittitta, Elena Dipietro, Alessandro Comis, Chiara Melfa, Mariachiara Calì, Sofia Sammartino, Giulia Laterra, Holger Thiele, Lars Sondergaard, Corrado Tamburino, Marco Barbanti, Azeem Latib

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The performance of latest iteration transcatheter aortic valve replacement platforms in patients with small aortic anatomy remains underexplored. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and performance between the self-expanding (SE) Evolut PRO and PRO+ and the balloon-expandable (BE) SAPIEN ULTRA in patients with small aortic annuli. Methods: Data from the OPERA-TAVI (Comparative Analysis of Evolut PRO vs. SAPIEN 3 ULTRA Valves for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) registry were used, with 1:1 propensity score matching. Primary endpoints included 1-year effectiveness composite (all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, or heart failure hospitalization) and 30-day device-related (hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction and nonstructural valve dysfunction) outcomes. Results: Among 3,516 patients, 251 matched pairs with aortic annular area <430 mm2 were assessed. The 1-year primary effectiveness outcome did not differ significantly between cohorts (SE 10.8% vs BE 11.2%; P = 0.91). The 30-day device-oriented composite outcome was more favorable in the Evolut PRO group (SE 4.8% vs BE 10.4%; P = 0.027). Notably, SE valve recipients showed higher rates of disabling stroke (SE 4.0% vs BE 0.0%; P < 0.01) and paravalvular leaks (mild or greater: SE 48.5% vs BE 18.6% [P < 0.001]; moderate: SE 4.5% vs BE 1.2% [P = 0.070]). The BE group had higher rates of prosthesis-patient mismatch (moderate or greater: SE 16.0% vs BE 47.1% [P < 0.001]; severe: SE 1.3% vs BE 5.7% [P = 0.197]) and more patients with residual mean gradients >20 mm Hg (SE 1.0% vs BE 13.5%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with small aortic annuli, transcatheter aortic valve replacement with latest iteration devices is safe. SE platforms are associated with more favorable device performance in terms of hemodynamic structural and nonstructural dysfunction. Randomized data are needed to validate these findings and guide informed device selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)681-692
Number of pages12
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 11 2024

Keywords

  • aortic stenosis
  • balloon expandable
  • self-expanding
  • small annuli
  • transcatheter aortic valve replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evolut PRO and SAPIEN ULTRA Performance in Small Aortic Annuli: The OPERA-TAVI Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this