Establishing a Threshold of Impairment to Define Preoperative Coronal Malalignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients

  • Scott L. Zuckerman
  • , Fthimnir M. Hassan
  • , Christopher S. Lai
  • , Yong Shen
  • , Mena Kerolus
  • , Alex Ha
  • , Ian Buchannan
  • , Meghan Cerpa
  • , Nathan J. Lee
  • , Zeeshan M. Sardar
  • , Ronald A. Lehman
  • , Lawrence G. Lenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Study Design: Single-center retrospective analysis. Objective: To establish an empirically derived threshold to define both coronal and sagittal malalignment (CM & SM) based on preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Summary of Background Data: Currently, no radiographic alignment threshold defines preoperative CM in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients based on disability. In a cohort of ASD patients undergoing corrective surgery, we sought to establish a threshold to define both CM and SM based on PRO and assess the clinical impact of CM and combined with SM. Methods: ASD patients with ≥6 level fusions were included. CVA and SVA were measured. PROs included preoperative ODI and SRS-22r scores. CVA and SVA thresholds were derived to accurately differentiate patients with ODI >40 and SRS-pain+function <5. Patients were then separated into 4 groups: (1) neutral alignment (NA); (2) CM; (3) SM; and (4) combined coronal and sagittal malalignment (CCSM). Results: Totally, 368 patients were included. Thresholds to distinguish patients with ODI ≥40 and SRS-pain/function <5 were: (1) CVA=3.96 cm (ODI) and 3.17 cm (SRS); (2) SVA=4.97 cm (ODI) and 7.52 cm (SRS). The lower numbers were chosen to define each threshold: CVA=3 cm and SVA=5 cm. Alignment breakdown was: NA=179 (48.6%), CM=66 (17.9%), SM=65 (17.7%), and CCSM=58 (15.8%). Both SM=(P=0.006) and CCSM (P<0.001) patients had significantly worse ODI scores than NA patients, and CCSM patients were significantly worse than SM alone (P=0.010). On the basis of preoperative total SRS-22r scores, only CCSM (P=0.003) patients were significantly worse than the NA group. CVA significantly correlated with 4/7 (57.1%) preoperative PROs (ODI/SRS-total/function/image), while SVA correlated with 5/7 (71.4%) preoperative PROs (ODI/SRS-total/function/image/pain). A linear relationship was seen between increasing CVA and worsening ODI (β=0.92, 95% CI: 0.37-1.48, P=0.001). A significant and slightly stronger relationship was seen between increasing SVA and worsening ODI (β=1.28, 95% CI: 1.00-1.56, P<0.001). Conclusions: CM and SM thresholds that accurately distinguished ASD patients with severe pain and disability preoperatively were 3 cm for CVA and 5 cm for SVA, respectively. Preoperative CM was significantly associated with worse ODI, SRS-22r total/function/image scores. CCSM led to more disability than SM alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClinical spine surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adult spinal deformity
  • combined malalignment
  • coronal malalignment
  • outcomes
  • sagittal malalignment
  • threshold

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing a Threshold of Impairment to Define Preoperative Coronal Malalignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this