TY - JOUR
T1 - Emergency Department Utilization for Patients Living With Sickle Cell Disease
T2 - Psychosocial Predictors of Health Care Behaviors
AU - Abdallah, Khadijah
AU - Buscetta, Ashley
AU - Cooper, Kayla
AU - Byeon, Julia
AU - Crouch, Andrew
AU - Pink, Sabrina
AU - Minniti, Caterina
AU - Bonham, Vence L.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge all of the study participants living with SCD, who generously offered their time to participate in the INSIGHTS Study. Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). This work was supported in part by the Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research InstituteZIAHG200394. Publication of this supplement was supported by the Office of Minority Health of the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Funding Information:
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org ). This work was supported in part by the Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research InstituteZIAHG200394. Publication of this supplement was supported by the Office of Minority Health of the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American College of Emergency Physicians
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Study objective: Individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD) often require urgent care; however, some patients hesitate to present to the emergency department (ED), which may increase the risk of serious clinical complications. Our study aims to examine psychosocial, clinical, and demographic factors associated with delaying ED care. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 267 adults with SCD from the national INSIGHTS Study. The binary outcome variable asked whether, in the past 12 months, participants had delayed going to an ED when they thought they needed care. Logistic regression was performed with clinical, demographic, and psychosocial measures. Results: Approximately 67% of the participants reported delaying ED care. Individuals who delayed care were more likely to have reported higher stigma experiences (odds ratio [OR]=1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.16), more frequent pain episodes (OR=1.15; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.32), lower health care satisfaction (OR= 0.74; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.94), and more frequent ED visits (OR=6.07; 95% CI 1.18 to 31.19). Disease severity and demographics, including sex, age, and health insurance status, were not significantly associated with delay in care. Conclusion: Psychosocial factors, including disease stigma and previous negative health care experiences, are associated with delay of ED care in this SCD cohort. There is a need to further investigate the influence of psychosocial factors on the health care–seeking behaviors of SCD patients, as well as the downstream consequences of these behaviors on morbidity and mortality. The resulting knowledge can contribute to efforts to improve health care experiences and patient-provider relationships in the SCD community.
AB - Study objective: Individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD) often require urgent care; however, some patients hesitate to present to the emergency department (ED), which may increase the risk of serious clinical complications. Our study aims to examine psychosocial, clinical, and demographic factors associated with delaying ED care. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 267 adults with SCD from the national INSIGHTS Study. The binary outcome variable asked whether, in the past 12 months, participants had delayed going to an ED when they thought they needed care. Logistic regression was performed with clinical, demographic, and psychosocial measures. Results: Approximately 67% of the participants reported delaying ED care. Individuals who delayed care were more likely to have reported higher stigma experiences (odds ratio [OR]=1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.16), more frequent pain episodes (OR=1.15; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.32), lower health care satisfaction (OR= 0.74; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.94), and more frequent ED visits (OR=6.07; 95% CI 1.18 to 31.19). Disease severity and demographics, including sex, age, and health insurance status, were not significantly associated with delay in care. Conclusion: Psychosocial factors, including disease stigma and previous negative health care experiences, are associated with delay of ED care in this SCD cohort. There is a need to further investigate the influence of psychosocial factors on the health care–seeking behaviors of SCD patients, as well as the downstream consequences of these behaviors on morbidity and mortality. The resulting knowledge can contribute to efforts to improve health care experiences and patient-provider relationships in the SCD community.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090580051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090580051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.08.018
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.08.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 32928463
AN - SCOPUS:85090580051
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 76
SP - S56-S63
JO - Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians
JF - Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians
IS - 3
ER -