TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of Silicone Gel Versus Placebo for Postsurgical Scars of the Eyelids
T2 - A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Study
AU - Karanfilian, Troy S.
AU - Thuma, Tobin
AU - Cheng, Tiffany
AU - Paramo, Ricky
AU - Moon, Jee Young
AU - Akella, Sruti
AU - Barmettler, Anne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose: While silicone has been shown to be effective on scars on the sternum, foot, and other areas with thicker skin, the effect of silicone on scars in the thin periocular skin has not yet been evaluated in a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded fashion. Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study enrolled patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty or bilateral upper eyelid ptosis repair. Subjects were randomized to apply silicone gel to 1 eyelid incision site and placebo (petrolatum ointment) to the other side twice daily postoperatively. Outcome measures were physician-graded scar erythema, elevation, and pigmentation, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, itching, pain, and firmness. These were assessed postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Results: Of 192 eyelids from 96 patients, there were no significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in any outcomes between silicone gel and placebo across any measure or time point. Patient satisfaction and blinded doctor and patient appearance preferences did not show any significant difference between the 2 treatments at any time point. Average follow-up was 11 weeks (range: 1-136 weeks). Discussion: This clinical trial suggests that topical silicone may not offer significant advantages over petrolatum ointment in improving eyelid scar healing. Overall results indicate similar efficacy between treatments. These results underscore the importance of evidence-based medicine in choosing beneficial and cost-effective interventions.
AB - Purpose: While silicone has been shown to be effective on scars on the sternum, foot, and other areas with thicker skin, the effect of silicone on scars in the thin periocular skin has not yet been evaluated in a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded fashion. Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study enrolled patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty or bilateral upper eyelid ptosis repair. Subjects were randomized to apply silicone gel to 1 eyelid incision site and placebo (petrolatum ointment) to the other side twice daily postoperatively. Outcome measures were physician-graded scar erythema, elevation, and pigmentation, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, itching, pain, and firmness. These were assessed postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Results: Of 192 eyelids from 96 patients, there were no significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in any outcomes between silicone gel and placebo across any measure or time point. Patient satisfaction and blinded doctor and patient appearance preferences did not show any significant difference between the 2 treatments at any time point. Average follow-up was 11 weeks (range: 1-136 weeks). Discussion: This clinical trial suggests that topical silicone may not offer significant advantages over petrolatum ointment in improving eyelid scar healing. Overall results indicate similar efficacy between treatments. These results underscore the importance of evidence-based medicine in choosing beneficial and cost-effective interventions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219744309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85219744309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002913
DO - 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002913
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219744309
SN - 0740-9303
JO - Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery
JF - Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery
M1 - 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002913
ER -