Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Early, precise, and safe clinical evaluation of the pharmacodynamic effects of novel agents in the intact human tumor microenvironment

  • Kenneth R. Gundle
  • , Karthik Rajasekaran
  • , Jeffrey Houlton
  • , Gary B. Deutsch
  • , Thomas J. Ow
  • , Robert G. Maki
  • , John Pang
  • , Cherie Ann O. Nathan
  • , Daniel Clayburgh
  • , Jason G. Newman
  • , Elyse Brinkmann
  • , Michael J. Wagner
  • , Seth M. Pollack
  • , Matthew J. Thompson
  • , Ryan J. Li
  • , Vikas Mehta
  • , Bradley A. Schiff
  • , Barry I. Wenig
  • , Paul L. Swiecicki
  • , Alice L. Tang
  • Jessica L. Davis, Annemieke van Zante, Jessica A. Bertout, Wendy Jenkins, Atticus Turner, Marc Grenley, Connor Burns, Jason P. Frazier, Angela Merrell, Kimberly H.W. Sottero, Jonathan M.J. Derry, Kate C. Gillespie, Bre Mills, Richard A. Klinghoffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Drug development is systemically inefficient. Research and development costs for novel therapeutics average hundreds of millions to billions of dollars, with the overall likelihood of approval estimated to be as low as 6.7% for oncology drugs. Over half of these failures are due to a lack of drug efficacy. This pervasive and repeated low rate of success exemplifies how preclinical models fail to adequately replicate the complexity and heterogeneity of human cancer. Therefore, new methods of evaluation, early in the development trajectory, are essential both to rule-in and rule-out novel agents with more rigor and speed, but also to spare clinical trial patients from the potentially toxic sequelae (high risk) of testing investigational agents that have a low likelihood of producing a response (low benefit). Methods: The clinical in vivo oncology (CIVO®) platform was designed to change this drug development paradigm. CIVO precisely delivers microdose quantities of up to 8 drugs or combinations directly into patient tumors 4–96 h prior to planned surgical resection. Resected tissue is then analyzed for responses at each site of intratumoral drug exposure. Results: To date, CIVO has been used safely in 6 clinical trials, including 68 subjects, with 5 investigational and 17 approved agents. Resected tissues were analyzed initially using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays (115 biomarkers). As technology advanced, the platform was paired with spatial biology analysis platforms, to successfully track anti-neoplastic and immune-modulating activity of the injected agents in the intact tumor microenvironment. Discussion: Herein we provide a report of the use of CIVO technology in patients, a depiction of the robust analysis methods enabled by this platform, and a description of the operational and regulatory mechanisms used to deploy this approach in synergistic partnership with pharmaceutical partners. We further detail how use of the CIVO platform is a clinically safe and scientifically precise alternative or complement to preclinical efficacy modeling, with outputs that inform, streamline, and de-risk drug development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1367581
JournalFrontiers in Pharmacology
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • drug development
  • intratumoral microdosing
  • multidrug analyses
  • pharmacodynamics
  • phase 0
  • spatial profiling
  • tumor microenvironment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early, precise, and safe clinical evaluation of the pharmacodynamic effects of novel agents in the intact human tumor microenvironment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this