Does psychiatry residency training reflect the "real world" of psychiatry practice? A survey of residency graduates

Timothy Petersen, Maurizio Fava, Jonathan E. Alpert, Sienna Vorono, Kathy M. Sanders, David Mischoulon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations


Objective: The authors determine whether Massachusetts General Hospital's residency graduates believed their training reflected their current practice activities. Method: The authors surveyed 134 graduates from MGH and MGH-McLean residency classes from 1983 to 2003. Subjects ranked their satisfaction with different components of training on a scale of 1 to 6 and listed areas they wanted emphasized during residency. Results: Sixty-six subjects (49%) returned surveys. Twenty respondents graduated in the 1980s (Cohort 1), 27 in the 1990s (Cohort 2), and 16 in the 2000s (Cohort 3). The most common activities included psychopharmacology, teaching, supervision, research, administration, psychodynamic therapy, and supportive therapy. Least common activities included geriatrics, addiction, and psychoanalysis. Satisfaction with training was high, as was relevance of training. Conclusions: Our graduates from 1983 to 2003 considered residency good preparation for the world of practice and reported that psychopharmacology should be emphasized during training. Respondents expressed a strong desire for continued training in psychodynamic therapy, despite growing emphasis on short-term therapies and biological treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-289
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic Psychiatry
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Does psychiatry residency training reflect the "real world" of psychiatry practice? A survey of residency graduates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this