Correction to: Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Hernia, (2024), 28, 6, (2069-2078), 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9)

Ana Caroline Dias Rasador; Carlos André Balthazar da Silveira; Diego Laurentino Lima; Raquel Nogueira; Flavio Malcher; Prashanth Sreeramoju; Leandro T. Cavazzola

doi:10.1007/s10029-024-03175-w

Correction to: Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Hernia, (2024), 28, 6, (2069-2078), 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9)

Ana Caroline Dias Rasador, Carlos André Balthazar da Silveira, Diego Laurentino Lima, Raquel Nogueira, Flavio Malcher, Prashanth Sreeramoju, Leandro T. Cavazzola

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

The correct sentence in the conclusion should read: Additionally, despite the overall analysis showing higher risk of seroma and wound infection for the mesh repair, no differences were seen after subgroup analysis of RCTs. The Editor-in-Chief agrees with the correction. The original article has been corrected.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	2445
Number of pages	1
Journal	Hernia
Volume	28
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03175-w
State	Published - Dec 2024
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1007/s10029-024-03175-w

Cite this

Rasador, A. C. D., da Silveira, C. A. B., Lima, D. L., Nogueira, R., Malcher, F., Sreeramoju, P., & Cavazzola, L. T. (2024). Correction to: Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Hernia, (2024), 28, 6, (2069-2078), 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9). Hernia, 28(6), 2445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03175-w

Correction to: Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Hernia, (2024), 28, 6, (2069-2078), 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9). / Rasador, Ana Caroline Dias; da Silveira, Carlos André Balthazar; Lima, Diego Laurentino et al.
In: Hernia, Vol. 28, No. 6, 12.2024, p. 2445.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Rasador, ACD, da Silveira, CAB, Lima, DL, Nogueira, R, Malcher, F, Sreeramoju, P & Cavazzola, LT 2024, 'Correction to: Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Hernia, (2024), 28, 6, (2069-2078), 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9)', Hernia, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03175-w

@article{1feef3d64c6a47dd8cc6af8605d3c51a,

title = "Correction to: Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Hernia, (2024), 28, 6, (2069-2078), 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9)",

abstract = "The correct sentence in the conclusion should read: Additionally, despite the overall analysis showing higher risk of seroma and wound infection for the mesh repair, no differences were seen after subgroup analysis of RCTs. The Editor-in-Chief agrees with the correction. The original article has been corrected.",

author = "Rasador, {Ana Caroline Dias} and {da Silveira}, {Carlos Andr{\'e} Balthazar} and Lima, {Diego Laurentino} and Raquel Nogueira and Flavio Malcher and Prashanth Sreeramoju and Cavazzola, {Leandro T.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1007/s10029-024-03175-w",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "28",

pages = "2445",

journal = "Hernia",

issn = "1265-4906",

publisher = "Springer Paris",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Hernia, (2024), 28, 6, (2069-2078), 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9)

AU - Rasador, Ana Caroline Dias

AU - da Silveira, Carlos André Balthazar

AU - Lima, Diego Laurentino

AU - Nogueira, Raquel

AU - Malcher, Flavio

AU - Sreeramoju, Prashanth

AU - Cavazzola, Leandro T.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2024.

PY - 2024/12

Y1 - 2024/12

N2 - The correct sentence in the conclusion should read: Additionally, despite the overall analysis showing higher risk of seroma and wound infection for the mesh repair, no differences were seen after subgroup analysis of RCTs. The Editor-in-Chief agrees with the correction. The original article has been corrected.

AB - The correct sentence in the conclusion should read: Additionally, despite the overall analysis showing higher risk of seroma and wound infection for the mesh repair, no differences were seen after subgroup analysis of RCTs. The Editor-in-Chief agrees with the correction. The original article has been corrected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204168212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85204168212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10029-024-03175-w

DO - 10.1007/s10029-024-03175-w

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 39292379

AN - SCOPUS:85204168212

SN - 1265-4906

VL - 28

SP - 2445

JO - Hernia

JF - Hernia

IS - 6

ER -

Correction to: Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Hernia, (2024), 28, 6, (2069-2078), 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9)

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this