Correcting bias caused by missing data in the estimate of the effect of apolipoprotein i4 on cognitive decline

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Longitudinal administration of neuropsychological instruments are often used to assess age-related changes in cognition. Informative loss to follow-up may bias the results of these studies. Herein, we use auxiliary data to adjust for informative loss to follow-up. In the Einstein Aging Study, memory was assessed annually in a community sample of adults age 70+, free of dementia at baseline, using the free recall from the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, and via telephone using the Memory Impairment Screen for Telephone (the auxiliary data). Joint linear mixed models were used to assess how the effect of the APOE I4 genotype may be affected by informative missingness in the in-person data. A total of 620 EAS participants contributed 2085 person years of follow-up to the analyses. Memory decline rates estimated in joint models were 19% greater in I4 negative participants and 27% greater in I4 positive participants compared to traditional approaches; the effect of APOE I4 on memory decline was 37% greater. Joint modeling methods can help address bias caused by informative missing data in the estimation of the effect of risk factors on cognitive change, and may be applicable to a broader range of outcomes in longitudinal aging studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-90
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 18 2014


  • Apolipoprotein E4
  • Bias (Epidemiology)
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Memory
  • Models
  • Risk Factors
  • Statistical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Correcting bias caused by missing data in the estimate of the effect of apolipoprotein i4 on cognitive decline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this