Comment to: TESLAR for treatment of umbilical/paraumbilical hernia and rectus abdominus diastasis is associated with unacceptable persistent seroma formation. Should subcutaneous endoscopic mesh placement be abandoned?

C. Claus; F. Malcher; L. T. Cavazzola

doi:10.1007/s10029-020-02285-5

Comment to: TESLAR for treatment of umbilical/paraumbilical hernia and rectus abdominus diastasis is associated with unacceptable persistent seroma formation. Should subcutaneous endoscopic mesh placement be abandoned?

C. Claus, F. Malcher, L. T. Cavazzola

Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1411-1412
Number of pages	2
Journal	Hernia
Volume	24
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02285-5
State	Published - Dec 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1007/s10029-020-02285-5

Cite this

Comment to: TESLAR for treatment of umbilical/paraumbilical hernia and rectus abdominus diastasis is associated with unacceptable persistent seroma formation. Should subcutaneous endoscopic mesh placement be abandoned? / Claus, C.; Malcher, F.; Cavazzola, L. T.
In: Hernia, Vol. 24, No. 6, 12.2020, p. 1411-1412.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

@article{4fdda9e0543945ee82fe51bda6a74ab0,

title = "Comment to: TESLAR for treatment of umbilical/paraumbilical hernia and rectus abdominus diastasis is associated with unacceptable persistent seroma formation. Should subcutaneous endoscopic mesh placement be abandoned?",

author = "C. Claus and F. Malcher and Cavazzola, {L. T.}",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1007/s10029-020-02285-5",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "24",

pages = "1411--1412",

journal = "Hernia",

issn = "1265-4906",

publisher = "Springer Paris",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment to

T2 - TESLAR for treatment of umbilical/paraumbilical hernia and rectus abdominus diastasis is associated with unacceptable persistent seroma formation. Should subcutaneous endoscopic mesh placement be abandoned?

AU - Claus, C.

AU - Malcher, F.

AU - Cavazzola, L. T.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089824234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089824234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10029-020-02285-5

DO - 10.1007/s10029-020-02285-5

M3 - Letter

C2 - 32840704

AN - SCOPUS:85089824234

SN - 1265-4906

VL - 24

SP - 1411

EP - 1412

JO - Hernia

JF - Hernia

IS - 6

ER -

Comment to: TESLAR for treatment of umbilical/paraumbilical hernia and rectus abdominus diastasis is associated with unacceptable persistent seroma formation. Should subcutaneous endoscopic mesh placement be abandoned?

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this