TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive-Based Interventions to Improve Mobility
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Marusic, Uros
AU - Verghese, Joe
AU - Mahoney, Jeannette R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Objective: A strong relation between cognition and mobility has been identified in aging, supporting a role for enhancement mobility through cognitive-based interventions. However, a critical evaluation of the consistency of treatment effects of cognitive-based interventions is currently lacking. The objective of this study was 2-fold: (1) to review the existing literature on cognitive-based interventions aimed at improving mobility in older adults and (2) to assess the clinical effectiveness of cognitive interventions on gait performance. Design: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of cognitive training interventions for improving simple (normal walking) and complex (dual task walking) gait was conducted in February 2018. Setting and Participants: Older adults without major cognitive, psychiatric, neurologic, and/or sensory impairments were included. Measures: Random effect meta-analyses and a subsequent meta-regression were performed to generate overall cognitive intervention effects on single- and dual-task walking conditions. Results: Ten RCTs met inclusion criteria, with a total of 351 participants included in this meta-analysis. Cognitive training interventions revealed a small effect of intervention on complex gait [effect size (ES) = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 0.81, P =.007, I2 = 15.85%], but not simple gait (ES = 0.35, 95% CI –0.01 to 0.71, P =.057, I2 = 57.32%). Moreover, a meta-regression analysis revealed that intervention duration, training frequency, total number of sessions, and total minutes spent in intervention were not significant predictors of improvement in dual-task walking speed, though there was a suggestive trend toward a negative association between dual-task walking speed improvements and individual training session duration (P =.067). Conclusions/Implications: This meta-analysis provides support for the fact that cognitive training interventions can improve mobility-related outcomes, especially during challenging walking conditions requiring higher-order executive functions. Additional evidence from well-designed large-scale randomized clinical trials is warranted to confirm the observed effects.
AB - Objective: A strong relation between cognition and mobility has been identified in aging, supporting a role for enhancement mobility through cognitive-based interventions. However, a critical evaluation of the consistency of treatment effects of cognitive-based interventions is currently lacking. The objective of this study was 2-fold: (1) to review the existing literature on cognitive-based interventions aimed at improving mobility in older adults and (2) to assess the clinical effectiveness of cognitive interventions on gait performance. Design: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of cognitive training interventions for improving simple (normal walking) and complex (dual task walking) gait was conducted in February 2018. Setting and Participants: Older adults without major cognitive, psychiatric, neurologic, and/or sensory impairments were included. Measures: Random effect meta-analyses and a subsequent meta-regression were performed to generate overall cognitive intervention effects on single- and dual-task walking conditions. Results: Ten RCTs met inclusion criteria, with a total of 351 participants included in this meta-analysis. Cognitive training interventions revealed a small effect of intervention on complex gait [effect size (ES) = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 0.81, P =.007, I2 = 15.85%], but not simple gait (ES = 0.35, 95% CI –0.01 to 0.71, P =.057, I2 = 57.32%). Moreover, a meta-regression analysis revealed that intervention duration, training frequency, total number of sessions, and total minutes spent in intervention were not significant predictors of improvement in dual-task walking speed, though there was a suggestive trend toward a negative association between dual-task walking speed improvements and individual training session duration (P =.067). Conclusions/Implications: This meta-analysis provides support for the fact that cognitive training interventions can improve mobility-related outcomes, especially during challenging walking conditions requiring higher-order executive functions. Additional evidence from well-designed large-scale randomized clinical trials is warranted to confirm the observed effects.
KW - Gait control
KW - computerized cognitive training
KW - elderly
KW - fall risk
KW - neurophysiological plasticity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045917550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045917550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.02.002
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29680203
AN - SCOPUS:85045917550
SN - 1525-8610
VL - 19
SP - 484-491.e3
JO - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
IS - 6
ER -