TY - JOUR
T1 - Cervical cancer screening intervals and management for women living with HIV
T2 - A risk benchmarking approach
AU - Robbins, Hilary A.
AU - Strickler, Howard D.
AU - Massad, L. Stewart
AU - Pierce, Christopher B.
AU - Darragh, Teresa M.
AU - Minkoff, Howard
AU - Keller, Marla J.
AU - Fischl, Margaret
AU - Palefsky, Joel
AU - Flowers, Lisa
AU - Rahangdale, Lisa
AU - Milam, Joel
AU - Shrestha, Sadeep
AU - Colie, Christine
AU - D'Souza, Gypsyamber
N1 - Funding Information:
Data in this article were collected by the Womens Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Author contributions: H.A.R. and G.D. conceived of and designed the study. H.D.S., L.S.M., C.B.P., T.M.D., H.M., M.J.K., M.F., J.P., L.F., L.R., J.M., S.S., C.C., and G.D. collected and/or managed the data. H.A.R. analyzed the data with supervision by G.D. and additional input from H.D.S., L.S.M., and C.P.B. H.A.R. and G.D. drafted the manuscript with input from H.D.S. and L.S.M. All authors revised the manuscript and gave final approval. Research support: WIHS (Principal Investigators): UABMS WIHS (Michael Saag, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, and Deborah Konkle-Parker), U01-AI-103401; Atlanta WIHS (Ighovwerha Ofotokun and Gina Wingood), U01-AI-103408; Bronx WIHS (Kathryn Anastos), U01-AI-035004; Brooklyn WIHS (H.M. and Deborah Gustafson), U01-AI-031834; Chicago WIHS (Mardge Cohen and Audrey French), U01-AI-034993; Metropolitan Washington WIHS (Seble Kassaye), U01- AI-034994; Miami WIHS (M.F. and Lisa Metsch), U01-AI-103397; UNC WIHS (Adaora Adimora), U01- AI-103390; Connie Wofsy Womens HIV Study, Northern California (Ruth Greenblatt, Bradley Aouizerat, and Phyllis Tien), U01-AI-034989; WIHS Data Management and Analysis Center (Stephen Gange and Elizabeth Golub), U01-AI-042590; Southern California WIHS (J.M.), U01-HD-032632 (WIHS I WIHS IV). The WIHS is funded primarily by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), with additional cofunding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and the National Institute on Mental Health (NIMH). Targeted supplemental funding for specific projects is also provided by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), and the NIH Office of Research onWomens Health. WIHS data collection is also supported by UL1- TR000004 (UCSF CTSA) and UL1-TR000454 (Atlanta CTSA). H.D.S. was supported by R01-CA-085178 and R01-CA-174634. H.A.R was supported by the Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention, and Control Training Grant (T32-CA009314) and a NRSA individual predoctoral fellowship (F31-CA210660). HPV testing data were provided by H.D.S., J.P., and Robert D. Burk. The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health. Some authors have been members of guidelines committees as follows: T.M.D. was a member of one of the working groups for the ACS/ASCCP/ASCP cervical cancer screening guidelines. L.S.M. was on the panel that developed the 2012 ACS/ASCCP/ASCP cervical cancer screening guidelines. L.S.M., J.P., and H.D.S. were on the panel that developed the CDC management of opportunistic infections (OI) guidelines (section for management of HPV, including cervical cancer screening, in Adults/Adolescents with HIV). H.M. serves on the panel that writes perinatal guidelines for HIV (AIDSinfo.nih.gov). In addition, a study of H.D.S. involves free blinded testing using HPV E6/E7 protein assays by Arbor Vita, p16/Ki67 cytology by MTM Laboratories/VenturaRoche, and MCM-2/ TOP2A cytology by BD Diagnostics; no financial payments to H.D.S. or his home institution were received.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/4/24
Y1 - 2017/4/24
N2 - Objective: We suggested cervical cancer screening strategies for women living with HIV (WLHIV) by comparing their precancer risks to general population women, and then compared our suggestions with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. Design: We compared risks of biopsy-confirmed cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (bHSIL+), calculated among WLHIV in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, to 'risk benchmarks' for specific management strategies in the general population. Methods: We applied parametric survival models among 2423 WLHIV with negative or atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology during 2000'2015. Separately, we synthesized published general population bHSIL+ risks to generate 3-year risk benchmarks for a 3-year return (after negative cytology, i.e. 'rescreening threshold'), a 6'12-month return (after ASC-US), and immediate colposcopy [after low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)]. Results: Average 3-year bHSIL+ risks among general population women ('risk benchmarks) were 0.69% for a 3-year return (after negative cytology), 8.8% for a 612-month return (after ASC-US), and 14.4% for colposcopy (after LSIL). Most CDC guidelines for WLHIV were supported by comparing risks in WLHIV to these benchmarks, including a 3-year return with CD4+ greater than 500 cells/ml and after either three negative cytology tests or a negative cytology/oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (all 3-year risks≤1.3%); a 1-year return after negative cytology with either positive oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (1-year risk=1.0%) or CD4+ cell count less than 500 cells/ml (1-year risk=1.1%); and a 612-month return after ASC-US (3-year risk=8.2% if CD4+ cell count at least 500 cells/ml; 10.4% if CD4+ cell count=350499 cells/μl). Other suggestions differed modestly from current guidelines, including colposcopy (vs. 612 month return) for WLHIV with ASC-US and CD4+ cell count less than 350 cells/μl (3-year risk=16.4%) and a lengthened 2-year (vs. 1-year) interval after negative cytology with CD4+ cell count at least 500 cells/ml (2-year risk=0.98%). Conclusions: Current cervical cancer screening guidelines for WLHIV are largely appropriate. CD4 cell count may inform risk-tailored strategies.
AB - Objective: We suggested cervical cancer screening strategies for women living with HIV (WLHIV) by comparing their precancer risks to general population women, and then compared our suggestions with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. Design: We compared risks of biopsy-confirmed cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (bHSIL+), calculated among WLHIV in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, to 'risk benchmarks' for specific management strategies in the general population. Methods: We applied parametric survival models among 2423 WLHIV with negative or atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology during 2000'2015. Separately, we synthesized published general population bHSIL+ risks to generate 3-year risk benchmarks for a 3-year return (after negative cytology, i.e. 'rescreening threshold'), a 6'12-month return (after ASC-US), and immediate colposcopy [after low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)]. Results: Average 3-year bHSIL+ risks among general population women ('risk benchmarks) were 0.69% for a 3-year return (after negative cytology), 8.8% for a 612-month return (after ASC-US), and 14.4% for colposcopy (after LSIL). Most CDC guidelines for WLHIV were supported by comparing risks in WLHIV to these benchmarks, including a 3-year return with CD4+ greater than 500 cells/ml and after either three negative cytology tests or a negative cytology/oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (all 3-year risks≤1.3%); a 1-year return after negative cytology with either positive oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (1-year risk=1.0%) or CD4+ cell count less than 500 cells/ml (1-year risk=1.1%); and a 612-month return after ASC-US (3-year risk=8.2% if CD4+ cell count at least 500 cells/ml; 10.4% if CD4+ cell count=350499 cells/μl). Other suggestions differed modestly from current guidelines, including colposcopy (vs. 612 month return) for WLHIV with ASC-US and CD4+ cell count less than 350 cells/μl (3-year risk=16.4%) and a lengthened 2-year (vs. 1-year) interval after negative cytology with CD4+ cell count at least 500 cells/ml (2-year risk=0.98%). Conclusions: Current cervical cancer screening guidelines for WLHIV are largely appropriate. CD4 cell count may inform risk-tailored strategies.
KW - Benchmarking
KW - CD4
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
KW - HIV
KW - High-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia
KW - Precancer
KW - Risk
KW - Screening guidelines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015717763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015717763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001450
DO - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001450
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28323758
AN - SCOPUS:85015717763
SN - 0269-9370
VL - 31
SP - 1035
EP - 1044
JO - AIDS
JF - AIDS
IS - 7
ER -