TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block and postoperative length of stay in the ambulatory care facility
T2 - a multicentre hospital registry study
AU - Azimaraghi, Omid
AU - Ahrens, Elena
AU - Wongtangman, Karuna
AU - Witt, Annika S.
AU - Rupp, Samuel
AU - Suleiman, Aiman
AU - Tartler, Tim M.
AU - Wachtendorf, Luca J.
AU - Fassbender, Philipp
AU - Choice, Curtis
AU - Houle, Timothy T.
AU - Eikermann, Matthias
AU - Schaefer, Maximilian S.
N1 - Funding Information:
ME has received unrestricted funds from philanthropic donors Jeffrey and Judy Buzen and grants from Merck & Co and serves as a consultant on the advisory board of Merck & Co. He is a member of the associate editorial board of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. MSS has received grants from Merck & Co. He is an associate editor for BMC Anesthesiology. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.Philanthropic donors Jeffrey and Judy Buzen (unrestricted funds to ME) and Merck & Co. (MK8616/V-9572 to ME); Merck & Co. (###? to MSS). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study or analysis, interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 British Journal of Anaesthesia
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: Encapsulation of rocuronium or vecuronium with sugammadex can reverse neuromuscular block faster than neostigmine reversal. This pharmacodynamic profile might facilitate patient discharge after ambulatory surgery. Methods: We included patients who underwent ambulatory surgery with general anaesthesia and neuromuscular block between 2016 and 2021 from hospital registries at two large academic healthcare networks in the USA. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay in the ambulatory care facility (PLOS-ACF). We examined post hoc whether the type of reversal affects postoperative nausea and vomiting and direct hospital costs. Results: Among the 29 316 patients included, 8945 (30.5%) received sugammadex and 20 371 (69.5%) received neostigmine for reversal. PLOS-ACF and costs were lower in patients who received sugammadex vs neostigmine (adjusted difference in PLOS-ACF: –9.5 min; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], –10.5 to –8.5 min; adjusted difference in direct hospital costs: –US$77; 95% CI, –$88 to –$66; respectively; P<0.001). The association was magnified in patients over age 65 yr, with ASA physical status >2 undergoing short procedures (<2 h) (adjusted difference in PLOS-ACF: –18.2 min; 95% CI, –23.8 to –12.4 min; adjusted difference in direct hospital costs: –$176; 95% CI, –$220 to –$128; P<0.001). Sugammadex use was associated with reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (17.2% vs 19.6%, P<0.001), which mediated its effects on length of stay. Conclusions: Reversal with sugammadex compared with neostigmine was associated with a small decrease in postoperative length of stay in the ambulatory care unit. The effect was magnified in older and high-risk patients, and can be explained by reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting. Sugammadex reversal in ambulatory surgery may also help reduce cost of care.
AB - Background: Encapsulation of rocuronium or vecuronium with sugammadex can reverse neuromuscular block faster than neostigmine reversal. This pharmacodynamic profile might facilitate patient discharge after ambulatory surgery. Methods: We included patients who underwent ambulatory surgery with general anaesthesia and neuromuscular block between 2016 and 2021 from hospital registries at two large academic healthcare networks in the USA. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay in the ambulatory care facility (PLOS-ACF). We examined post hoc whether the type of reversal affects postoperative nausea and vomiting and direct hospital costs. Results: Among the 29 316 patients included, 8945 (30.5%) received sugammadex and 20 371 (69.5%) received neostigmine for reversal. PLOS-ACF and costs were lower in patients who received sugammadex vs neostigmine (adjusted difference in PLOS-ACF: –9.5 min; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], –10.5 to –8.5 min; adjusted difference in direct hospital costs: –US$77; 95% CI, –$88 to –$66; respectively; P<0.001). The association was magnified in patients over age 65 yr, with ASA physical status >2 undergoing short procedures (<2 h) (adjusted difference in PLOS-ACF: –18.2 min; 95% CI, –23.8 to –12.4 min; adjusted difference in direct hospital costs: –$176; 95% CI, –$220 to –$128; P<0.001). Sugammadex use was associated with reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (17.2% vs 19.6%, P<0.001), which mediated its effects on length of stay. Conclusions: Reversal with sugammadex compared with neostigmine was associated with a small decrease in postoperative length of stay in the ambulatory care unit. The effect was magnified in older and high-risk patients, and can be explained by reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting. Sugammadex reversal in ambulatory surgery may also help reduce cost of care.
KW - ambulatory care facilities
KW - healthcare costs
KW - length of stay
KW - neostigmine
KW - neuromuscular block
KW - postoperative nausea and vomiting
KW - sugammadex
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144744915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144744915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.044
DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.044
M3 - Article
C2 - 36535827
AN - SCOPUS:85144744915
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 130
SP - 296
EP - 304
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 3
ER -