Abstract
Residency recruitment practices have undergone significant changes in the last several years. Interviews are now conducted fully virtually leading to both positive and negative downstream effects, including decreased cost to applicants and programs, decreased time away from clinical activities, flexibility in scheduling, and increased applications for applicants and program directors. In response to these changes, the Association of Academic Physiatrists Residency and Fellowship Program Directors Council convened a workgroup consisting of program directors, program coordinators, residents, and medical students who reviewed the available literature to provide an evidence-based set of best practices for program leaders and applicants. Available data from the Association of American Medical Colleges and its relevance to future recruitment cycles are also discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 561-565 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation |
Volume | 103 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Graduate Medical Education
- PM&R Residency
- Physiatry Residency
- Residency Application
- Residency Recruitment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Rehabilitation