TY - JOUR
T1 - Amplifying patient voices amid pandemic
T2 - Perspectives on tracheostomy care, communication, and connection
AU - Pandian, Vinciya
AU - Hopkins, Brandon S.
AU - Yang, Christina J.
AU - Ward, Erin
AU - Sperry, Ethan D.
AU - Khalil, Ovais
AU - Gregson, Prue
AU - Bonakdar, Lucy
AU - Messer, Jenny
AU - Messer, Sally
AU - Chessels, Gabby
AU - Bosworth, Barbara
AU - Randall, Diane M.
AU - Freeman-Sanderson, Amy
AU - McGrath, Brendan A.
AU - Brenner, Michael J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Vinciya Pandian receives support from NIH ( National Institute of Nursing Research , NINR ( R01NR017433-01A1 )).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Objective: To investigate perspectives of patients, family members, caregivers (PFC), and healthcare professionals (HCP) on tracheostomy care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The cross-sectional survey investigating barriers and facilitators to tracheostomy care was collaboratively developed by patients, family members, nurses, speech-language pathologists, respiratory care practitioners, physicians, and surgeons. The survey was distributed to the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative's learning community, and responses were analyzed. Results: Survey respondents (n = 191) from 17 countries included individuals with a tracheostomy (85 [45 %]), families/caregivers (43 [22 %]), and diverse HCP (63 [33.0 %]). Overall, 94 % of respondents reported concern that patients with tracheostomy were at increased risk of critical illness from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19; 93 % reported fear or anxiety. With respect to prioritization of care, 38 % of PFC versus 16 % of HCP reported concern that patients with tracheostomies might not be valued or prioritized (p = 0.002). Respondents also differed in fear of contracting COVID-19 (69 % PFC vs. 49 % HCP group, p = 0.009); concern for hospitalization (55.5 % PFC vs. 27 % HCP, p < 0.001); access to medical personnel (34 % PFC vs. 14 % HCP, p = 0.005); and concern about canceled appointments (62 % PFC vs. 41 % HCP, p = 0.01). Respondents from both groups reported severe stress and fatigue, sleep deprivation, lack of breaks, and lack of support (70 % PFC vs. 65 % HCP, p = 0.54). Virtual telecare seldom met perceived needs. Conclusion: PFC with a tracheostomy perceived most risks more acutely than HCP in this global sample. Broad stakeholder engagement is necessary to achieve creative, patient-driven solutions to maintain connection, communication, and access for patients with a tracheostomy.
AB - Objective: To investigate perspectives of patients, family members, caregivers (PFC), and healthcare professionals (HCP) on tracheostomy care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The cross-sectional survey investigating barriers and facilitators to tracheostomy care was collaboratively developed by patients, family members, nurses, speech-language pathologists, respiratory care practitioners, physicians, and surgeons. The survey was distributed to the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative's learning community, and responses were analyzed. Results: Survey respondents (n = 191) from 17 countries included individuals with a tracheostomy (85 [45 %]), families/caregivers (43 [22 %]), and diverse HCP (63 [33.0 %]). Overall, 94 % of respondents reported concern that patients with tracheostomy were at increased risk of critical illness from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19; 93 % reported fear or anxiety. With respect to prioritization of care, 38 % of PFC versus 16 % of HCP reported concern that patients with tracheostomies might not be valued or prioritized (p = 0.002). Respondents also differed in fear of contracting COVID-19 (69 % PFC vs. 49 % HCP group, p = 0.009); concern for hospitalization (55.5 % PFC vs. 27 % HCP, p < 0.001); access to medical personnel (34 % PFC vs. 14 % HCP, p = 0.005); and concern about canceled appointments (62 % PFC vs. 41 % HCP, p = 0.01). Respondents from both groups reported severe stress and fatigue, sleep deprivation, lack of breaks, and lack of support (70 % PFC vs. 65 % HCP, p = 0.54). Virtual telecare seldom met perceived needs. Conclusion: PFC with a tracheostomy perceived most risks more acutely than HCP in this global sample. Broad stakeholder engagement is necessary to achieve creative, patient-driven solutions to maintain connection, communication, and access for patients with a tracheostomy.
KW - Advocacy
KW - Anxiety
KW - COVID-19
KW - Caregivers
KW - Communication
KW - Comorbidities
KW - Coronavirus
KW - Crisis Standards of Care
KW - Depression
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Health care professionals
KW - Healthcare access
KW - Nursing
KW - Patient experience
KW - Patient-centered care
KW - Patients
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Rationing
KW - Resource scarcity
KW - Respiratory care practitioner
KW - Respiratory therapy
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Safety
KW - Speech-language pathology
KW - Tracheostomy
KW - Tracheotomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132238599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132238599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103525
DO - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103525
M3 - Article
C2 - 35717856
AN - SCOPUS:85132238599
SN - 0196-0709
VL - 43
JO - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
JF - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
IS - 5
M1 - 103525
ER -