TY - JOUR
T1 - ACR RADPEER Committee White Paper with 2016 Updates
T2 - Revised Scoring System, New Classifications, Self-Review, and Subspecialized Reports
AU - Goldberg-Stein, Shlomit
AU - Frigini, L. Alexandre
AU - Long, Scott
AU - Metwalli, Zeyad
AU - Nguyen, Xuan V.
AU - Parker, Mark
AU - Abujudeh, Hani
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Radiology
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - The ACR's RADPEER program is currently the leading method for peer review in the United States. To date, more than 18,000 radiologists and more than 1,100 groups participate in the program. The ABR accepted RADPEER as a practice quality improvement in 2009, which can be applied toward maintenance of certification; there are currently over 2,200 practice quality improvement participants. There have been ongoing deliberations regarding the utility of RADPEER, its goals, and its scoring system since the preceding 2009 white paper. This white paper reviews the history and evolution of RADPEER and eRADPEER, the 2016 ACR Peer Review Committee's discussions, the updated recommended scoring system and lexicon for RADPEER, and updates to eRADPEER including the study type, age, and discrepancy classifications. The central goal of RADPEER to aid in nonpunitive peer learning is discussed.
AB - The ACR's RADPEER program is currently the leading method for peer review in the United States. To date, more than 18,000 radiologists and more than 1,100 groups participate in the program. The ABR accepted RADPEER as a practice quality improvement in 2009, which can be applied toward maintenance of certification; there are currently over 2,200 practice quality improvement participants. There have been ongoing deliberations regarding the utility of RADPEER, its goals, and its scoring system since the preceding 2009 white paper. This white paper reviews the history and evolution of RADPEER and eRADPEER, the 2016 ACR Peer Review Committee's discussions, the updated recommended scoring system and lexicon for RADPEER, and updates to eRADPEER including the study type, age, and discrepancy classifications. The central goal of RADPEER to aid in nonpunitive peer learning is discussed.
KW - RADPEER
KW - RADPEER learning
KW - nonpunitive
KW - peer learning
KW - peer review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019609013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019609013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.023
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 28551339
AN - SCOPUS:85019609013
SN - 1546-1440
VL - 14
SP - 1080
EP - 1086
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 8
ER -