Abstract
The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. Here, we present the Appropriateness Criteria for cancers arising in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (maxillary, sphenoid, and ethmoid sinuses). This includes clinical presentation, prognostic factors, principles of management, and treatment outcomes. Controversies regarding management of cervical lymph nodes are discussed. Rare and unusual nasal cavity cancers, such as esthesioneuroblastoma and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas, are included.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 407-418 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Head and Neck |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Appropriateness Criteria
- esthesioneuroblastoma
- nasal cavity cancer
- paranasal sinus cancer
- sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Otorhinolaryngology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'ACR appropriateness criteria® nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS